Appointing Governors : Non performing liabilities

The government of India as always recently came up with a list of who's of who to be appointed as governors of various states across India . constitutionally governors are nominal heads of states who appoint the elected premiere or chief ministers . their Job is limited to attending functions, Participating / conducting awards ceremonies , addressing joint sessions of assemblies etc..

I was wondering, why the hell the posts of governors were created as they serve no official purpose , they are an absolute waste of federal funds , as these posts serve with either minimum or zero contribution to the state in law making process. Quite frankly these are an utter syndicate of Non performing liabilities (NPL or Non performing assets ) . History of political landscape in india shows that , as always congress party sets up a trend in appointing these Non performing liabilities as governors across indian states, whose main Job is to raise flags (flag hoisting ) , distribute awards, praise freedom fighters and lead a lavish royal life style at free of cost with their extended family members ..., and needless to say their role often becomes like a Single point of contact (SPOC ) for non official recommendations, celebrations at their official places called Raj bhavans across state capitals.

most of these governors are either retired bureaucrats, political cronies, corrupt officials and of course party loyalist ..at worst shrewd offenders of law of the land !! if people with such backgrounds of such an utter disgrace are appointed as a token gesture for their loyalism towards ruling elite . then obviously , there is a fundamental flawed in the way Indian political landscape functions . the best remedy to eliminate "appointing governors drama" is to eliminate them completely from the constitutional process , as they neither serve any official purpose nor they are constitutionally advantageous for the growth of society at large !!